THE INFLUENCE OF STAKEHOLDER’S PERCEPTIONS OF PARATRANSIT SACCOs ON PERFORMANCE OF URBAN PUBLIC ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY IN KENYA

LUCY WAMALWA SIMANI

Abstract


The objective of Kenyan Government Legal Notices No. 161 of 2003, No. 83 of 2004 and No. 65 of 2005, Was to restore order, reduce accidents, increase passenger safety, reduce conflicts and safeguard private investment in the public transport sector .This notice directed all current and potential paratransit operators in Kenya to establish Paratransit SACCOs ; as a condition for the licensing of their vehicles to operate public service transport. The transport industry is affected by stakeholderswho are affected by the achievement of the organization objectives.Theirinfluence  on the performance ofurban road transportcan be negative or positive, depending on whether their expectations are being met or not. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of stakeholder’s perceptions of paratransit SACCOs on performance of urban public transport industry in Kenya.The specific objective was to determine the perceptions of paratransit owners on the effect of paratransit SACCOs on the performance urban public transport industry,To ascertain the perceptions of  Local Authority on the effect of paratransitSACCOs on the performance of urban public transport industry and finally To investigate the perceptions of paratransit operators on the effect of paratransitSACCOs on the performance of urban public transport industry. The study targeted 635paratransit (matatu) SACCOS registered in Kenya. A sample of 64 was selected from the registeredSACCO. Data was collected using questionnaire and analyzed using descriptive statistics. Based on the findings of the study, it was concluded that stakeholder’s perceptions of the Paratransit SACCOS significantly influenced the performance of urban road transport in Kenya. The study recommended that the government should adequately engage stakeholders during urban road policy formulations and implementations this will result to the stakeholders ownership of decisions, reduces negative influence and consequently success of the policy.

Key Words: Stakeholders, Paratransit SACCOs, Performance


Full Text:

PDF

References


Aaltonen, K., Sivonen, R., 2009. Response strategies to stakeholder pressures in global projects. International Journal of Project Management 27(2), 131-141

Aligula, E.Z., Z. Abiero-Garly, J. Mutua, F. Owegi, C. Osengo and R. Olela (2005) „Urban Public Transport Patterns in Kenya: A Case Study of Nairobi City, Survey Report.‟ Special Report No. 7. Nairobi: KIPPRA.

Alston, P. (2009). Report of the special rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, mission to Kenya. New York: UN Human Rights Council. Available at http://www.extrajudicialexecutions.org/application/media/Kenya%20Mission%202009%20%28A_HRC_11_2_Add.6%29.pdf.

Anderson, D. (2002). Vigilantes, violence and the politics of public order in Kenya. African Affairs, 101, 531–555.

Azetsop, J. (2010). Social justice approach to road safety in Kenya: addressing the uneven distribution of road traffic injuries and deaths across population groups. Public Health Ethics, 1–13.

Berman, S., A. Wicks, S. Kotha and T. Jones: 1999, 'Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship Between Stakeholder Management Models and Firm Financial Performance', Academy of Management Journal 4, 488-506.,

Brouthers, K. and G.J. Bamossy, “Post Formation Processes in Eastern and Western European Joint Ventures,” (2006) Academy of Management Journal, 43, 2, March, pgs. 22-38. Abstracted in: International Abstracts of Human Resources, Spring, 2006.

Bwana M. Kembo&MwakujongaJoshua(2013) Issues in SACCOS Development in Kenya and Tanzania: The Historical and Development Perspectives. www.iiste.org

BosseD. A., PhillipsR.A. and HarrisonJ.S.(2009)Stakeholders, Reciprocity, and Firm performance.Strategic Management Journal Strat. Mgmt. 7., 30: 447-456 (2009) Wiley InterScience

BOURNE, L. & WALKER, D. H. T. 2005.Visualising and mapping stakeholder influence. Management decision, 43, pp. 649-660

Chitere, P .O. (2004) ‘Matatu Industry in Kenya: A Study of the Performance of Owners, Workers, and the Associations and Potential for Improvement’. Institute of Policy Analysis and Research Discussion Paper Series, Discussion Paper No. 055/2004, Kenya Institute of Policy Analysis and Research, Kenya: Regal Press, 2004

Chitere, Preston. O. and Kibua, Thomas. N. (2004) ‘Efforts to Improve Road Safety in Kenya: Achievements and Limitation of Reforms in the Matatu Industry’. Institute of Policy Analysis and Research, Kenya: Regal Press, 2004

Clarkson, M.B.E. (1995), A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance, The Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92.

Delmas, M. and Toffel, M. W. 2004. Stakeholders and environmental management practices: An institutional framework. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13(4): 209-222

Dobre, O. (2013) Employee motivation and organizational performance, Review of Applied Socio- Economic Research (Volume 5, Issue 1/ 2013), pp. 53

Freeman, R.E. (1984), Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, Boston: Pitman. Frooman, J. (1999), Stakeholder influence strategies, The Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 191

Gicheru E, Migwi W; and M’Imanyara K.An Analysis of the Socio-Economic Impact of the New Integrated National Transport Policy: The Case of 14-Seat Transport SACCOs in Kenya, ICA Global Research Conference Held at Mikkeli in Finland, 24-28 August 2011

Gonzales, E., Chavis, C., Li, Y., &Daganzo, C. (2010). Multimodal transport in Nairobi, Kenya: Insights and recommendations with a macroscopic evidence-based model. Working paper.UC Berkeley Center for Future Urban Transport. Available at: http://www.its.berkeley.edu/publications/UCB/2009/ VWP/UCB-ITS-VWP-20

Graeff ,J. (2013)The Organization, Issues and the Future Role of the Matatu Industry in Nairobi, Kenya.Center for Sustainable Urban Development (CSUD) at Columbia University’s Earth Institute 2910 Hogan Hall, Level A MC 3277 New York, NY 10025 United States of America

International cooperative alliance (2005)http://ica.coop/en/whats-co-op/co-operative-identity-values-principles

International Monetary Fund, (2007) Kenya: Poverty Reduction Strategy Annual

Isabelle, M.O.C., &Ferrell,L.F. (2005). "A stakeholder model for implementing social responsibility in marketing". European Journal of Marketing, 39 (9/10), 956 – 977.

Jawahar, I.M. and Gary, L.M. (2001), Toward a descriptive stakeholder theory: An organizational life cycle approach. The Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 397.

Jepsen, A. L. & Eskerod, P. 2009. Stakeholder analysis in projects: Challenges in using current guidelines in the real world. International Journal of Project Management, 27, pp. 335-343.

Khayesi, M., 1999. The Struggle for Regulatory and Economic Sphere of Influence in the Matatu Means of Transport in Kenya: A Stakeholder Analysis. Department of Geography at Kenyatta University, Nairobi Kenya. Sixth International Conference on Competition and Ownership in Land Passenger Transport, Cape Town, South Africa 19-23 September 1999.

Khayesi, M. (1998). The need for an integrated road safety programme for the city of Nairobi, Kenya. In P. Freeman & C. Janet (Eds.), Urban transport policy: A sustainable development tool (pp. 579–582). Rotterdam: AABalkema.

Khayesi, M. (2003).Liveable streets for pedestrians in Nairobi: The challenge of road traffic accidents. In J. Whitelegg& G. Haq (Eds.), The Earthscan reader on world transport policy and practice (pp. 35– 41). London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.

Klopp, J.M. (2011), Towards a Political Economy of Transportation Policy and Practice in Nairobi, Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

McCormick Dorothy, MitullahV.Winnie, Chitere Preston, RisperOrero and Marilyn Ommeh (2013),” Institutions and Business Strategies of Matatu Operators in Nairobi: A Case Study Report”: University of Nairobi

McCormick, D., W. Mitullah, P. Chitere, R. Orero and M. Ommeh (2011b). „Firm Strategies and Institutions: Paratransit Strategies and Transport Regulation in Nairobi: A Literature Review‟. ACET Project WP 1. Cape Town: University of Cape Town.

McElroy, B. and Mills, C. (2000), Managing Stakeholders, In Gower Handbook of Project Management, ed. J. R. Turner and S. J. Simister, Gower Publishing Limited, 757-775

Miller, R., Hobbs, B., 2006. Managing Risks and Uncertainty in Major Projects in the New Global Environment. In: Cleland, D.I., Gareis, R., (Eds.), Global Project Management Handbook. Planning, Organizing, and Controlling International Projects, 2nd Edition.McGrawHill, New York, 9-1.

Mudibo, E. K. (2006), Challenges and Opportunities Facing the Kenyan Savings and Credit Co-operative Movement, Presentation during the Africa Savings and Credit Co-operatives Conference 3rd - 6th October 2006 at the Grand Regency Hotel, Nairobi, Kenya

Nantulya, V., &Muli-Musiime, F. (2001). Kenya: Uncovering the social determinants of road traffic accidents. In T. Evans, et al. (Eds.), Challenging inequities in health: From ethics to action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Newcombe, R., 2003. From client to project stakeholders: a stakeholder mapping approach. Construction Management and Economics, 21(8), 841-848

Neville, B. A., Menguc, B., 2006. Stakeholder multiplicity: Toward an understanding of the interactions between stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(4), 377-391.

Nguyen, Nhat Hong and Skitmore, Martin and Wong, Wai K.J. (2009) Stakeholder impact analysis of infrastructure project management in developing countries : a study of perception of project managers in state-owned engineering firms in Vietnam. Construction Management and Economics, 27(11). pp. 1129-1140

Pieterse, E. (2010). Cityness and African urban development. Urban Forum, 21, 205–219

RisperOrero and Dorothy McCormick. Organization of Paratransit in Nairobi: Voluntary Vs. Mandatory Savings and Credit Co-operatives. Institute for Development Studies, University of Nairobi. Revised 13 December 2010.

Rodgers w.andGago S.(2004)Stakeholder Influence on Corporate Strategies over TimeAuthor(s): Source: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 52, No. 4 (Jul., 2004), pp. 349-363 Springer

Sallinen, L., Ruuska, I. &Ahola, T. 2013, ‘How governmental stakeholders influence large projects: the case of nuclear power plant project’, International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 51-68.

Shaarani, A.F., and Kasmuri, N. (2008).Cooperative movement in Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur. Gempita Maju Publishing.

Salon, D., &Gulyani, S. (2010). Mobility, poverty and gender: travel “Choices” of slum residents transport reviews. A Transnational Tran disciplinary Journal, 30(5), 1464–5327

Republic of Kenya. National Integrated Transport Policy, 2003

The Traffic Act Cap 403 (1963) .Legal Notice NO.161 of 2003

The International Co-operative Alliance (1995): Statement on Co-op Identity adopted at the 1995 Congress General Assembly

UNDP (2006) :Multi-stakeholder engagement processes a undp capacity developmentresource. http://www.undp.org/content/dam/aplaws/publication/en/publications/capacity-development/drivers-of-change/accountability/multi-stakeholder-engagement-proc

Wanyama F.O (2009): Surviving liberalization: the cooperative movement in Kenya, ILO Coop Africa

Ward, S., Chapman, C., 2008. Stakeholders and uncertainty management in projects. Construction Management and Economics, 26(6), 563-577




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v2i1.103

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 4 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 3 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 2 [2024] Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.