EFFECT OF SUPPLIER QUALITY COMMITMENT ON THE PROCUREMENT PERFORMANCE GOVERNMENT MINISTRIES IN RWANDA
Abstract
Selection and maintaining competent suppliers are very essential in procurement. There are many factors that affect a firm's ability to choose the right supplier. Less has been done to investigate the supplier quality commitment on the procurement performance in the Rwandan context. The purpose of the study was to examine the effect of supplier quality commitment on the procurement performance within MININFRA. The study adopted descriptive research design to effect of supplier quality commitment on the procurement performance within MININFRA. The study population was 102 employees from all departments of MININFRA. 45 employees were sampled by using Slovin’s formula. This study used questionnaire technique to correct data. Quantitative data obtained from close ended questions was analyzed by using descriptive statistics. Narrative data obtained from interviews and open-ended questions in the questionnaire were analyzed using qualitative approaches. Data collected was analyzed using SPSS version 21. The results indicated that Supplier quality commitment have a relationship with Procurement performance. The significance was 0.000 which indicated that there is positive relationship (0.772) between Supplier quality commitment and Procurement performance. These results provided reasonable evidence to the consistent view that, Procurement performance of MININFRA justified by increase of Supplier quality commitment. The beta of Supplier quality commitment was .444 with a t-statistic of 2.241. The positive coefficients mean a unit change in Supplier quality commitment leads to 0.772 units increase in Procurement performance while keeping financial sustainability and Supplier competence constant. P- value = 0.000 < 0.05 the positive t-statistic value indicated that the effect is statistically significant at 5 % test level. The study concluded that the ministry of infrastructure has supplier appraisal evaluation criteria in place for various supplier categories. In overall, achievement of product quality affects procurement performance though the effect is not significant. The study recommended that supplier evaluation should be done by experts who are knowledgeable and have expertise to conduct the exercise professionally. This is because supplier selection and evaluation are a process vulnerable to personal and political interference especially in the public sector. Quality commitment must be considered a critical factor in supplier evaluation and supplier selection.
Keywords: Supplier evaluation, supplier performance management, procurement performance
CITATION: Munyaneza, R., & Mulyungi, P. (2021). Effect of supplier quality commitment on the procurement performance government ministries in Rwanda. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 8 (1), 447 – 456.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adamyan, S. H. (2012). Supplier selection and order allocation based on fuzzy SWOT analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 38 (1), 334-342.
Akenroye et al. (2012), “Purchasing Principles and Management”, 5th Edn. London: Pitman
Albert, K. (2011), Supplier selection and order allocation based on fuzzy SWOT analysis. Expert Systems with Applications, 38 (1). 334-342
CIPS. (2013). Monitoring the Performance of Suppliers-CIPS Positions on Practice. CIPS
Hald, K.S., & Ellegaard, C. (2011). Supplier evaluation processes: the shaping and Reshaping of supplier performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31(8): 888-910
Handfield, R., Walton, S., Sroufe R. & Melnyk S. 2012. Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: A study in the application of the analytical hierarchy process.”, European Journal of Operational Research, 141(1), 70-87.
Hofmann, E. (2013). Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning and Operation, S. Chopra, P. Meindl. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 19(3), 212-213.
Humphreys, P. K. (2012). The impact of supplier development on buyer–supplier performance. Omega, 32 (2004) 131–143
Humphreys P.K., Li W.L. & Chan L.Y. (2013). The impact of supplier development on buyer-supplier performance. Omega - The International Journal of Management Science, 32, 131-143.
Kemunto, D. (2014). Influence of Strategic Buyer Supplier Alliance on Procurement
Kitheka, S. M. (2013). The Effect of Supplier Quality Management on Organizational Performance: A Survey of Supermarkets in Kakamega Town. International Journal of Business and Commerce, Vol. 3, No.1: Sep 2013 [71-82].
Liu, J, Ding, F.Y., & Loll, V. (2010). Using data envelopment analysis to compare suppliers for supplier selection and performance improvement. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 5(3), 143–50Marks, B. S. (2017). Developing Suppliers in a Lean Environment - Supplier Competency Model. The University of Michigan.
Mugenda, M., & Mugenda, G., A (2013). Seminar Methods; Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Laba Graphics Services
OECD, (2017). Introduction to educational research. Egerton: Egerton University education book series
Pamela, J. (2013). Timing and extent of supplier integration in new product development: A contingency approach. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 7(4): 345-358.
PPOA, (2009). Assessment of the Procurement System in Kenya. Nairobi: OECD
Quinot & Pontious (2013). Sustainable supply chain financing: how financial institutions could enhance supply chain sustainability.
RPPA. (2012). Intermediate level training in public procurement. Kigali: RPPA.
RPPA. (2014). Intermediate level training in public procurement. Kigali: RPPA.
Tully (2011). Supplier Evaluations: Best Practices and Creating or Improving Your Own Evaluation. 89th Annual International Supply Management Conference.
Williamson, C. C. (2010). An optimization approach to determining the number of vendors to employ. Supply chain management: an international Journal, 5, 90-98
World bank (2013),). Purchasing and Supply Chain Management. Analysis, Strategy, Planning and Practice (5th ed. ed.). Andover: Cengage Learning. ISBN 978-1-4080-1896-5.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v8i1.1925
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
PAST ISSUES:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.