WORK ENVIRONMENT AND PERFORMANCE OF EMPLOYEES IN PUBLIC HEALTH SECTOR IN NAIROBI CITY, COUNTY KENYA

DANIEL K. KIIRU, DR. DAVID KIIRU (PhD)

Abstract


This study investigated the effects of working environment on performance of employees in public health sector in Nairobi County Kenya. The specific objectives of the study were: to determine whether physical work environment, supervisor support, psychological work environment and social work environment has influence on performance of employees in public health sector in Nairobi County Kenya. This study utilized the descriptive research design. The study population consisted of all the employees in Nairobi County, public health sector institutions totalling 4227. The data collection involved both primary and secondary data collection methods. Primary data was sourced by use of questionnaires validity and reliability of research instruments was also ensured. The collected data was analyzed by both descriptive and inferential statistics with the aid of the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 24. The study established that physical work environment, supervisor support, psychological work environment and social work environment had a positive and significant influence on performance of employees in the public health sector in Nairobi County Kenya. The study concluded that a positive work atmosphere improves efficiency and competitiveness while also being beneficial to one’s health. Support from supervisors has the greatest impact on creating unity, which is precisely what is required in modern, cross-functional, team-based environments. A positive psychological work environment gives an understanding of the relationship between organizational strategies and their personnel, as well as their impact on human behavior in the workplace, and as a result, a vision to examine why some strategies are more productive than others and that good organizational and social work environment management makes it easier to get the job done while defusing stressful situations. The study recommended that the public health sector in Kenya should design office environments to accommodate the varying tasks and the specific needs of the workforce. Supervisors should assist employees in achieving their goals and improving their abilities by serving as a point of contact between top and middle management. The public health sector in Kenya should reflect conditions that support cooperation between superiors, subordinates and those who have the same position in the organization. The management of the public health sector in Kenya should consider social environment in their organization which will help to improve home life interferences with responsibilities at work such as getting to work on time.

Key Words: Work Environment, Supervisor Support, Psychological Work Environment, Social Work

CITATION: Kiiru, D. K., & Kiiru, D. (2022). Work environment and performance of employees in public health sector in Nairobi City, County Kenya. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 9 (2), 1301 -1317.

 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Aaltonen, D. (2017). Human Resource Management in Context, London, CIPD. Journal of Public Administration, 3(1), 1-14.

Agbozo, Owusu, & Atakorah, (2017).You try to be a fair employer’ Regulation and employment relationships in medium-sized firms, International Small Business Journal 34(1), 16–33.

Alshmemri, M., Shahwan-Akl, L., & Maude, P. (2017a). Herzberg’s two-factor theory. Life Science Journal, 14(5), 12–16.

Aston-James, C., & Ashkanasy, N., (2005). What Lies Beneath? A Process of Analysis of Affective Events Theory, Effect of Affect in Organizational Settings Research on Emotion in Organizations.

Briner, R.B. (2010). Relationships Between Work Environments, Psychological Environments & Psychological Well-Being. Journal of Occupational Medicine, 50 (5), 299-303

Burke, A. (2000) The challenge of seating selection. Ergonomic Supplement, 69(4), pp.70-72.

Chandrasekar K. (2015). Workplace Environment and its Impact on Organizational Performance in Public Sector Organizations, International Journal Of Enterprise Computing and Business Systems, Vol:1,Issue:1.

Cropanzano, R., Dasborough, M., Weiss, H. (2017) ‘Affective Events and the Development of Leader-Member Exchange’. Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review [online] 42 (2), 233-258.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). The support of Autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 53(6), 1024-37

Elnaga, A. (2013). The effect of training on employee performance. European Journal of Business and Management, Vol. 5, No. 4.

Franco LM, Bennett S, Kanfer R,& Stubblebine P, (2000).Health Worker Motivation in Jordan and Georgia: A Synthesis of the Results, Major Applied Research 5, Technical Paper 3 Bethesda, Maryland: Partnership for Health Reform Project

Gomes, P.T., Kaiseler, M., Queirós, C., Oliveira, M., Lopes, B., & Coimbra, M. (2012). Vital Analysis: Annotating sensed physiological signals with the stress levels of first responders in action. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual International IEEE EMBC, 6695-6698.

Hughes, A. (2017). The Open-Plan Office A Systematic Investigation of Employee Reactions to Their Work Environment. Environment and Behaviour, 14(5), 519-542.

Jain, R., & Kaur, S. (2014). Impact of work environment on job satisfaction. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 4(1), 1-8

Kohun, (2002). Workplace Environment and its impact on organizational performance in Public sector organizations, International Journal of Enterprise Computing and Business System International Systems, Vol. 1 Issue 1 January 2011

Mugenda, O. M., & Mugenda, A. G. (2013). Research methods. Nairobi: ACTS

Opperman, M. (2012). Precarious employment: Work re-organization and the factoring of OHS management. International Journal of Systematic Occupational Health and Safety Management, 24(10), 175-178

Raziq, A., & Maulabakhsh, R. (2015). Impact of working environment on job satisfaction. Procedia Economics and Finance, 23, 717-725

Sehgal, S. (2012). Relationship between Work Enviornment And Productivity. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 2(4), 1992-1995

Shamoo, A. & Resnik, D. B. (2015). Responsible Conduct of Research (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press: New York, United State of America

Sinha, E. S. (2016). The skills and career path of an effective project manager. International Journal of Project Management, 19, 1-7.

Smith, D.G. (2011). Work environment more important to employees. Retrieved November 25, 2011 from http://www.businessknowhow.com.

Stup, R. (2013). Control the factors that influence employee success. Managing the Hispanic workforce Conference. Cornell University and Pennsylvania State University.

Tangen, R. (2013). Balancing Ethics and Quality in Educational Research—The Ethical Matrix Method. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 58 (6):678-694.

Tenessek, L. (2019). The effects of working time on productivity and firm performance, research synthesis pa-per. International Labor Organization (ILO) Conditions of Work and Employment Series, (33).

Tripathi, A. (2014). Workplace Environment: Consequences on Employees. http://www.linkedin.com/pulse

Weiss, H.M., Cropanzano, R. (1996) ‘Affective Events Theory: A Theoretical Discussion of the Structure, Causes and Consequences of Affective Experiences at Work’ Research in Organisational Behaviour 18, 1-74

Young, N. (2009). Defining and measuring work engagement: bringing clarity to the concept, in work engagement




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v9i2.2333

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 4 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 3 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 2 [2024] Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.