PROCUREMENT RISK MANAGEMENT POLICIES AND PERFORMANCE OF KENYATTA INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION CENTRE, NAIROBI, KENYA

REBECCA MAITARIA, FELISTUS HILDA MAKHAMARA, PhD

Abstract


The main objective of this study was to investigate how Procurement Risk Management policies affect the performance of the Kenyatta International Conference Centre in Nairobi City County, Kenya. The study utilized Partner Selection Theory, Contract Management Theory, Balanced Scorecard Theory, and Technology Acceptance Theory as the theoretical frameworks. This study adopted descriptive research design. The target group included 336 staff members from different departments like Human Resources, Finance, Procurement, Information Technology, planning, sales, and marketing. The study included 101 participants chosen through a stratified random sampling method. To collect original data, semi-structured questionnaire utilizing the Likert scale was used. Before the main data gathering, a trial study was carried out to confirm the instrument's reliability and validity. Both inferential and descriptive statistics were used to analyze the quantitative data, with the use of the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS version 22). Mean, percentages, frequency distribution, and standard deviation were utilized for descriptive statistics. Visual representations of the results were created using pie charts, graphs, and tables. The study found a positive significant correlation linking procurement risk management policies and organizational performance. The study concludes that effective implementation of procurement risk management policies help to identify and assess potential risks in the procurement process, allowing for proactive measures to be taken to mitigate these risks. The study recommends that the organization can aim at establishing clear guidelines and expectations for supplier relationships, KICC to ensure that they are working with reliable and high-quality partners. KICC should implement a centralized contract management system by centralizing all contract management processes to ensure that all contracts are properly monitored, tracked, and managed. KICC should conduct a thorough analysis to identify potential risks in the procurement process, including financial, operational, reputational, and compliance risks. The organization should conduct a comprehensive assessment of the existing ICT infrastructure at KICC before implementing new policies.

Key Words: Procurement Risk Management Policies, Organizational Performance

CITATION: Maitaria, R., & Makhamara, F. H. (2024). Procurement risk management policies and performance of Kenyatta International Convention Centre, Nairobi, Kenya. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 11 (3), 813 – 824. Http://dx.doi.Org/10.61426/Sjbcm.v11i3.3062


Full Text:

PDF

References


Aladejebi, O. A., &Adedeji, A. O. (2015). Effect of procurement planning on the performance of selected agricultural firms in Ondo State, Nigeria. Jorind, 13(2),34-46.

Amelia S. & John N. P. (2002). The impact of purchasing and supplier involvement on strategic purchasing and its impact on firm’s performance, Oxford University Press, London, UK

Ansoff, H. I., & Sullivan, P. (1990). 'Competitiveness through strategic response': Constantly Improving Everything Inside and Outside the Organization. McGraw Hill, London

Arun, K., &Linet, O. (2005). Procurement performance measurement system in the health care industry; International Journal of Health Care Vol. 18 No. 2, 2005.

Barnes, R. W., Grove, J. W., & Burns, N. H. (2003). Experimental assessment of factors affecting transfer length. Structural Journal, 100(6), 740-748.

Basheka, B. C. (2008). Procurement planning and accountability of local Government procurement systems in developing countries: Evidence from Uganda. Journal of Public Procurement, 8(3), 379-406.

Brandmeier, R. A., & Rupp, F. (2010). Benchmarking procurement functions: causes for superior performance. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 17(1), 5-26.

Giunipero, L. C., & Sawchuk, C. (2000). E-purchasing plus: changing the way corporations buy. Influences and outcomes of outsourcing: insights from the telecommunications industry. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 13(4), 245-260.

Gul, H. (2010). Modernising public procurement and creating an independent public procurement regulatory authority. Law transition online.

Kamau, I. N. (2013). Buyer-supplier relationships and organizational performance among large

Kenya National Bureau of Statistics (2013), Economic Survey 2013. Government Printer, Nairobi.

Lardenoije, Van. R. & Van W. (2005) Purchasing Performance Measurement - Finance & Control, McGraw Hill, Freetown

Lehtiranta, L. (2014). Risk perceptions and approaches in multi-organizations: A research review 2000–2012. International Journal of Project Management, 32(4), 640-653.

Li, S., Ragu-Nathan, B., Ragu-Nathan, T. S., & Rao, S. S. (2006). The impact of supply chain management practices on competitive advantage and organizational performance. Omega, 34(2), 107-124.

Ngunyi, I. W. (2014). Procurement practices and the performance of parastatals in Kenya. Doctoral dissertation, university of Nairobi, Nairobi.

Nicol, W. (2003). Mainstreaming the Procurement Function into the Public Expenditure Policy and Effectiveness Dialogue. World Bank Roundtable, Paris, France, January, 22-23.

Onyango, C. J. (2014). Effects of procurement planning on institutional performance: A case study of Mombasa Law Court. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 3(11), 446-455

Peter, K., Rotich, G., & Ochiri, G. (2018). Influence of Procurement risk management on procurement performance of mega projects in the energy sector in Kenya. European Journal of Logistics, Purchasing and Supply Chain Management, 6(5), 1-12.

Weele, A. J. (2006). Purchasing and supply Chain Management: Analysis, Planning and Practice. Acts




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v11i3.3062

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 4 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 3 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 2 [2024] Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.