ROLE OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON IMPLEMENTATION OF AGRO – PRODUCE VALUE ADDITION PROJECTS IN KISUMU COUNTY - KENYA

CHLARIS ACHOLA WASONGA, SAMUEL WABALA, PhD

Abstract


The overall objective of this study was to establish role of project management practices on implementation of agro-produce value addition projects in Kisumu county - Kenya. The specific objectives of the study included: to determine the effect of Quality Management on implementation; to establish the effect of cost Management; to examine the effect of stakeholder participation and to determine the effect of change management on the implementation of agro – produce value addition projects in Kisumu County.  The study adopted a correlational survey design. The target population for the study constituted 100 workers stationed in value addition projects in Kisumu County. Purposive sampling technique was used to draw a sample of 100 respondents for the study. Data collection for the study was done using a structured questionnaire. The collected data was analyzed by generating frequencies and percentages. Means and standard deviations were also generated. Correlation analysis was undertaken to establish relationships between and among variables while regression analysis was undertaken to show the strength and direction of relationships among variables. The findings were presented using tables and figures. The study findings indicated that there is a positive and significant correlation between quality management, cost management, stakeholder participation and change management on the implementation of agro-value addition projects in Kisumu County. The unstandardized coefficients of the regression analysis showed that quality management(0.752) has the greatest effect on implementation of agro-value addition projects in Kisumu County, followed by stakeholder participation(0.562), then change management(0.490) and the least is cost management (0.305). The coefficient of determination was 0.553 meaning that quality management, cost management, stakeholder participation and change management all together accounts for 55.3% of implementation of agro-produce value addition projects in Kisumu County. The study concludes that more workers need to be involved in decision making in quality matters and monitoring and evaluation. Further, there is need to enhance the capacity of workers in embracing technological change to improve production processes. The study therefore recommends inclusion of workers in decision making and capacity building to improve workers’ capabilities during implementation of agro-value addition projects in Kisumu County.

Key Words: Quality Management, Cost Management, Stakeholder Participation, Change Management 

CITATION: Wasonga, C. A., & Wabala, S. (2024). Role of project management practices on implementation of agro – produce value addition projects in Kisumu County - Kenya. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 11 (4), 73 – 90. http://dx.doi.Org/10.61426/Sjbcm.v11i4.3067


Full Text:

PDF

References


Balckstock, K., Brown, K., Burton, R., Dilley, D., Ingram , J., Mills, J., & Taylor, J. (2007). Understanding and influencing positive behavious change in farmers and Land Managers. Cheltenham, Scotland: University of Gloucestershire.

Bordia, P., Hunt, E., Paulsen, N., Tourish, D., & Difunzo, N. (2014). Uncertainity During Organizational: Is it all about Control? European Journal of Work and Organizationoal Psychology, 13,345-365.

Bondina, N. N., Bondin, I. A., & Pavlova, I. V. (2021, March). Cost management models in agricultural business. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 650, No. 1, p. 012022). IOP Publishing.

Butler, M., Szweyczewsk, M., & Sweeny, M. (2018). A Model of Continous Improvement Programme Management. Journal of Production Planning & Control, 29(5):386-402.

Fernandes, G., Ward, S., & Araujo, M. (2013). Identifying Udeful Project Management Practice: A Mixed Methodology Approach. International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, 5-21. doi:http://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm010401

Fernandes, G., Ward, S., & Araújo, M. (2013). Identifying useful project management practices: A mixed methodology approach. International Journal of information systems and project management, 1(4), 5-21

Gitonga, S. (2018). Project Management Practices and Implementation of Projects in Manufacturing Companies in Nairobi County.

Njiru, S. G. (2018). Project management practices and implementation of projects in manufacturing companies in Nairobi City County, Kenya. Unpublished MBA Project, Kenyatta University.

Kerzner, H. (2017). Project Management . Hoboken, New Jersey : John Wiley & Sons .

Kothari, C. R. (2006). Research Methodology: Metheods and Techniques. India: New Age International (P)Ltd.

Mizanbekova, S., Umbetaliev, N., Aitzhanova, A., & Bogomolov, A. (2017). The quality management system improvement for the enhancement of production competitiveness. Revista Espacios, 38(42).

Mrema, G., & Ndikumana, J. (2019, 03 03). Value Addition and Post-Harvest Processing in East Africa over the past Fifty years and Prospects fro the Future. Retrieved from Value Addition and Post-Harvest Processing in East Africa over the past Fifty years and Prospects fro the Future

Muli, E. (2013). Public Projects Implementation . Project Manageement Journal , 22(3), 22-26.

Nalianya, R. S. (2018). Project Management Practices and Perfomance of agricultural projects by community-based organizations in Bungoma County, Kenya.

National Audit Office. (2013). Over Optimism in Government Projects . uk: NAO.

Obange, N. (2018). The Characteristics, Extent and Drivers of Urban Food Poverty in Kisumu, Kenya. Research gate, 1-32. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/330728079_The_Characteristics_Extent_and_Drivers_of_Urban_Food_Poverty_in_Kisumu_Kenya

Ofori, D. F. (2006). Problems of Project Management: Theory, Evidence and Opinion from Ghana. Oxford University Press.

Opiyo, P. &. (2018). The Characteristics of the Urban Food System in Kisumu,Kenya. Research Gate. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329632605_The_characteristics_of_the_urban_food_system_in_Kisumu_Kenya

Pells, D. L. (2021). Project Management Needs a Higher Purpose . Original Long Version , Vol X(Issue 1 ( ISSN: 2330-4480)). Retrieved 10 6, 202, from www.pmworldjournal.com

PMI. (2013). A Guide to the Project anagement Body of Knowledge (PMBOK GUIDE) (Vols. 67:341-349). PMI.

Schwalbe, K. (2015). Introduction to Project Management. Minneapolis, MN: Schwalbe Publishing.

Stanely , D., Meyer, J. P., & Topolnytsky, L. (2005). Employee Cynicism and Resistance to Organizational Change. Journal of Business and Psychology, 19,429-459.

Uriarte, F. A. (2008). Introduction to knowledge Management. Jakarta, Indonesia: ASEAN Foundation .

Usadolo, S., & Caldwe, M. (2016). A Stakeholder Approach to Community Participation in Rural Development Projects. SAGE open. doi:10.1177/2158244016638132

Wanberg, C. R., & Banas, J. T. (2000). Predicators and Outcomes of Openess to Changes in Reorganizing Workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85,132-142. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.132

Wanberg, C., & Banas, J. (2000). Predictors and Outcomes of Openness to Changes in Reorganizing Workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology, 132-142. doi:http:/dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.132

Wanza, L., & Nkuraru, J. (2016). INfluence i HCnage Management in Employee Perfomance: A CAse of University of Eldoret, Kenya. Journal of business and Social Science, 7.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v11i4.3067

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 4 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 3 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 2 [2024] Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.