HUMAN RESOURCE CAPACITY AND STAFF WELL-BEING IN NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS IN KENYA

ESTHER CHAUSIKU, DENNIS JUMA, PhD

Abstract


Employee wellbeing is a one of the main concerns that contemporary businesses strive to address in order to keep healthy relationships and also keep their staff content and interested at the job.  Organizations that have implemented health programs at work reported positive business results. For individuals, workplace well-being means a healthy and balanced life. Hybrid work is a flexible approach that combines working in an office environment and working from home. Hybrid work varies in flexibility and supports a variety of different work schedules. Organizations who use a hybrid work model can offer a better work-life balance to their employees. The study was anchored on theories namely; the network theory of well being and the planned theory of behavior. The study’s objective was the effect of human resource capacity on staff-wellbeing in Non -Governmental Organizations. The study employed the cross - sectional survey research design. The study was carried out among senior management of four non-governmental organizations in Westlands as its target population. Data was collected using questionnaires containing both open and closed ended questions which were administered by the researcher through the drop and pick technique. The collected data was analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics as well as qualitative methods to address the open-ended questions. The study results revealed that the Human Resource Capacity had an effect on staff wellbeing within non-governmental organizations. The study therefore, recommends that The NGOs should allow the human resource managers the flexibility to come up with strategies regarding staff development, invest more in digital platforms and equipment to support their employees in remote working, strive to improve their work environments in order to improving how the employees feel about their physical environment and  encourage the development of more staff friendly policies and practices that influence scheduling, follow up and tracking of all employees regardless of their locations.

Key Word: Human Resource Capacity, Role of Remote Working, Staff well-being

CITATION: Chausiku, E., & Juma, D. (2024). Human resource capacity and staff well-being in non-governmental organizations in Kenya. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 11 (4), 410 – 420. http://dx.doi.Org/10.61426/Sjbcm.v11i4.3092


Full Text:

PDF

References


Agostoni, L. (2020). Remote Working: Advices to Reduce Risks and Boost Productivity. Academic Press.

Asgari, Hamidreza, Rajesh Gupta, and Xia Jin. (2022). Impacts of COVID-19 on Future Preferences Toward Telework. Transportation Research Record. Transportation Research Record 2677: 611–28.

Bauer, W., Schlund, S., & Vocke, C. (2018). Working life within a hybrid world – How digital transformation and agile structures affect human functions and increase quality of work and business performance. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 594, 3–10. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-60372-8_1

Cook, J., Mor, Y., & Santos, P. (2020). Three cases of hybridity in learning spaces: Towards a design for a Zone of Possibility. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(4), 1155–1167. doi:10.1111/ bjet.12945

Kaushik, M., & Guleria, N. (2020). The impact of pandemic COVID-19 in workplace. European Journal of Business and Management, 12(15), 1–10.

Newman, S. A., & Ford, R. C. (2021). Five Steps to Leading Your Team in the Virtual COVID-19 Workplace. Organizational Dynamics, 50(1), 100802. doi:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2020.100802

Pieper, N. (2021). Creating a Culture of Innovation: How Businesses Used the COVID-19 Pandemic to Change the Future Workplace. Academic Press.

Yang, E., Bisson, C., & Sanborn, B. E. (2019). Co-working space as a third-fourth place: changing models of a hybrid space in corporate real estate. In Journal of Corporate Real Estate (Vol. 21, Issue 4, pp. 324–345). Emerald Group Holdings Ltd. doi:10.1108/JCRE-12-2018-0051

Krajcic, M., Schmidt, D.A, & Barath, M. (2023). Hybrid Work Model: An Approach to Work–Life Flexibility in a Changing Environment, Administrative Sciences 13(6):150 DOI:10.3390/admsci13060150

Barath, Matus, and Dusana A. Schmidt. (2022). Offices after the COVID-19 Pandemic and Changes in Perception of Flexible Office Space. Sustainability 14: 11158.

Hajal, Georges E. 2022. Teleworking and the jobs of tomorrow. Research in Hospitality Management 12: 21–27.

International Labor Organization. (2020). An Employers’ Guide on Working from Home in Response to the Outbreak of COVID-19. Available online: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/{-}{-}-ed_dialogue/{-}{-}-act_emp/documents/publication/wcms_745024.pdf (accessed on 8th March 2024).

Nemt,eanu, M, & Dabija. D. (2023). Negative Impact of Telework, Job Insecurity, and Work–Life Conflict on Employee Behaviour. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20: 4182.

Nilles, J. M. (1994). Making Telecommuting Happen: A Guide for Tele Managers and Telecommuters. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Vayre, É., Morin-Messabel, C., Cros, F., Maillot, A.S & Odin, N. (2022). Benefits and Risks of Teleworking from Home: The Teleworkers’ Point of View. Information 13: 545.

Akanle, O., Ademuson, A.O. and Shittu, O.S. 2020. Scope and Limitation of Study in Social Research. In Jegede, A.S. and Isiugo-Abanihe, U.C. (eds). Contemporary Issues in Social Research. Ibadan: Ibadan University Press. Pp. 105-114.

Setia, M.S. (2016). Methodology series module 2: Case‑control studies. Indian Journal of Dermatology; 61:146‑51.

Muriithi, L. M. (2023). Influence of remote working arrangements on employee productivity in the Communications Authority of Kenya [Strathmore University].




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v11i4.3092

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 4 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 3 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 2 [2024] Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.