EFFECT OF E-PROCUREMENT ADOPTION ON THE PERFORMANCE OF STATE CORPORATIONS UNDER THE STATE DEPARTMENT FOR INFRASTRUCTURE IN NAIROBI KENYA

ANNE NYAKIO KAMARU

Abstract


In Kenya procurement in public sector has been dogged by; corruption, political patronage, procurement system inefficiency, non-adherence to procurement policy guidelines and lack of a genuinely open and competitive system of procurement amongst other shortcomings. The study sought to establish effect of e-procurement adoption on the performance of the public sector; a case of state corporations under the State Department for Infrastructure. The study used Transaction Cost theory that facilitates coordination of costs and transaction. Information Systems Success theory that proposes that system quality and information quality affect users' usage and satisfaction. This study used a descriptive research design and explanatory research design. The population of interest was 142 employees in the procurement departments at State Department for Infrastructure. Stratified random sampling technique was used since the population of interest was not homogeneous. The study utilised primary data. Primary data was collected using data collection instrument. The study carried out a pilot study to test reliability and validity of the data collected from14 individuals from the target population. Data analysis was done with the use of SPSS version 23 and presented using percentages, tabulations, means and other central tendencies. This generated quantitative reports through tabulations, percentages, and measures of central tendency.  The study concluded that E-Sourcing and E-Informing all had a positive effect on the performance of state corporations under the State Department for Infrastructure. The Study recommended that the management of State corporations should fully adopt E–procurement system as it was found to enhance accountability through elimination of corruption, errors and hence ensuring efficiency of procurement systems. The study recommended that State corporations should continually keep on utilizing E-sourcing system as E-sourcing system was found to enhance coordination of procurement process and hence reduces bureaucracy which enhances efficiency of organization. State corporations should fully adopt E-informing systems as the system was found to enhance innovation process thus enhancing the procurement processes in the organization.

Key Words: E-sourcing, E-informing and Performance of State Corporations


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdi K. A. (2012). Electronic procurement and organizational performance among commercial state corporations. University of Nairobi.

Adebiyi, M. (2015). Development partners and governance of public procurement in Nigeria: enhancing democracy in the administration of aid. International law and politics Journal, 37(4), 829-868.

Andersen, P.H., & Christensen, P.R. (2005). “Bridges over troubled water: suppliers as connective nodes in global supply networks”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 58, pp. 1261-85.

Basheka, B. C., & Bisangabasaija, E. (2010). Determinants of unethical public procurement in local government systems of Uganda: a case study. Int. J. Procurement Management Journal, 3(1), 91–104.

Bensaou, M., & Venkatraman, N. (2006). “Interorganizational relationships and information technology: a conceptual synthesis and research framework”, European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 5, pp. 84-91.

Berger P. D., & Zeng A. Z. (2016). Single Versus Multiple Sourcing in the Presence of Risks. Journal of Operational Research Society, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 250-261.

Brown, D. (2015). Electronic Government and Public Administration: International Review of Administration Sciences. 71(2), 241 – 254.

Chemoiywo P. K. (2014). Public procurement procedures and supply chain performance in state corporations in Kenya. MBA Project, University of Nairobi.

Clemons, E.K. (2009). The impact of information technology on the organization of economic activity: The “move to the middle” hypothesis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10 (2), 9–35.

DeLone, W.H., & McLean, E.R. (2011). Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research Journal, 3 (1), 60–95.

Grover, G., Jeong, S.R. & Segars, A.H. (2010). Information systems effectiveness: The construct space and patterns of application. Information & Management Journal, (31) 4, 177–191.

Hannon, D. (2014). "Online buying gathers steam, one buyer at a time", Journal of Purchasing Management, 133 (16), 40-53.

Jeppesen R. 2010. Accountability in public procurement transparency and the role of civil society. United Nations Procurement Capacity Development Centre.

Kalakota, R., & Robinson, M. (2001). E-Business Journal. 2nd Edition, Addison Wesley, pp. 310.

Kamotho, D. K. (2014). E-procurement and procurement performance among state corporations in Kenya. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 23 (4), 43-54.

Kaufmann, L. & Carter, C. (2014). "Deciding on the mode of negotiation: to auction or not to auction electronically", Journal of Supply Chain Management, 40 (2), 15-26.

Kennedy, S., & Deeter-Schmelz, A. (2014)."The role of e- informing on organisation performance in Turkey", International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 33(8):720-34.

Kenya Institute for Public Policy Research and Analysis (KIPPRA) (2016).

Kipyego, F.W. (2012). Factors Influencing the Implementation of E-Procurement Among Firms Listed on the Nairobi Stock Exchange in Kenya. MBA Project, University of Nairobi.

Koorn, R. (2001). E-Procurement and Online Marketplaces Journal. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Compact.

Liker, J.K. & Choi, T.Y. (2014). “Building deep supplier relationships”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 82 No. 12, pp. 104-13.

Lysons, K., & Farrington, B. (2015). Purchasing and Supply Chain Management, 7th ed, Pearson Education Ltd.

Mollah, A. & Licker, P.S. (2011). “E-commerce Systems Success: An attempt to extend and respecify the DeLone and McLean Model of IS success”, Journal of Electronic Commerce Research 2(4):131-141.

Mugenda, O. & Mugenda, B. (2008). Research Methods. Quantitative and Qualitative. Nairobi: Acts Press Publishers.

Munezero, H. (2015). E-Procurement and Performance of Public Corporations in Rwanda Case of Rwanda Revenue Authority, Journal of Operations Management, 12(6):23-67.

Narasimhan, R. & Kim, S. (2002). "Effect of supply chain integration on the relationship between diversification and performance: evidence from Japanese and Korean firms", Journal of Operations Management, 20(3):303-23.

Public Procurement Oversight Authority (2015). Assessment of the Procurement Systemin Kenya. Public Procurement Oversight Authority.

Rai, A., Lang, S.S., & Welker, R.B. (2012). Assessing the validity of IS success models: An empirical test and theoretical analysis. Information Systems Research, 13, 1 50–69.

Sheilah, K. (2013). E-procurement and procurement performance of supermarkets in Nairobi.

Sijaona. A. I. (2010). Public procurement in Tanzania. Confronting the challenges and opportunities. Journal of public administration and policy research, 2(6), 103-111.

Tetra Tech International Development (2015). A report on the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission.

Wanzala, J. (2015). Treasury extends online tenders to parastatals. Standard Group, Nairobi.

Yoon, Y., Guimaraes, T., & Clevenson, A. (2008). Exploring expert systems success factors for business process reengineering. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 15, 2/3, 179–199.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.61426/sjbcm.v5i2.772

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

PAST ISSUES:
20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
Vol 11, No 4 [2024]Vol 10, No 4 [2023]Vol 9, No 4 [2022]Vol 8, No 4 [2021]Vol 7, No 4 [2020]Vol 6, No 4 [2019]Vol 5, No 4 [2018]Vol 4, No 4 [2017]Vol 3, No 4 [2016]Vol 2, No 2 [2015]Vol 1, No 2 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 3 [2024] Vol 10, No 3 [2023] Vol 9, No 3 [2022]Vol 8, No 3 [2021]Vol 7, No 3 [2020]Vol 6, No 3 [2019]Vol 5, No 3 [2019]Vol 4, No 3 [2017]Vol 3, No 3 [2016]Vol 2, No 1 [2015]Vol 1, No 1 [2014]
 Vol 11, No 2 [2024] Vol 10, No 2 [2023] Vol 9, No 2 [2022]Vol 8, No 2 [2021]Vol 7, No 2 [2020]Vol 6, No 2 [2019]Vol 5, No 2 [2018]Vol 4, No 2 [2017]Vol 3, No 2 [2016]  
 Vol 11, No 1 [2024] Vol 10, No 1 [2023] Vol 9, No 1 [2022]  Vol 8, No 1 [2021]Vol 7, No 1 [2020]Vol 6, No 1 [2019]Vol 5, No 1 [2018]Vol 4, No 1 [2017]Vol 3, No 1 [2016]   


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.